Hello, I am using a simple example of a MeshPhysicalMaterial with a transmission set to 1 but it looks completely different from version 133 to version 155. The former looks transparent and the latter always has a white color. I cannot figure out what is the property that is setting it: Three 133: …

Do you mind sharing a fiddle that demonstrates the issue? Are using a transparent background?

@Mugen87 sure thing: I added both versions, you can comment it out one or the other to see what I mean: Edit fiddle - JSFiddle - Code Playground Test your JavaScript, CSS, HTML or CoffeeScript online with JSFiddle code editor. Let me know if you need it di…

three.js r152 and r155 both contain important changes related to color management and lighting. There are detailed guides for both changes linked from the migrations page — [image] Migration Guide JavaScript 3D Library. Contribute to mrdoob/three.js development by creating an account on…

MeshPhysicalMaterial version 133 and version 155 difference

Questions

Who_Though September 20, 2023, 9:45am 3

Maybe related to this issue? MeshPhysicalMaterial's transmission property is broken on WebGPU API — (unfortunately no solution till now)

Topic		Replies	Views
Transmission \| MeshPhysicalMaterial \| does not work Questions materials , pbr	12	4794	October 25, 2021
Transmission rendering changed with version r150 Questions materials	1	344	December 4, 2023
In rev.151 examples the file /materials-physical-transmission has errors Questions pbr	4	735	April 16, 2023
Background not visible through MeshPhysicalMaterial Questions physical-material , r3f	9	860	October 24, 2023
MeshTransmissionMaterial: more realistic glas/epoxy/gelatin Showcase shaders	21	9451	April 13, 2026

MeshPhysicalMaterial version 133 and version 155 difference

Related topics