for the unnecessary, negative PR around it
for another initiative
Both here and on twitter you announce it more like an aggressive corporate takeover, and splitting three into “three community vs pmdrs community”, rather than just focusing on one community willing to add value to three (from my personal pov - it kinda feels more than ungrateful to the current maintainers of three spending their days on fixing other, essential issues.)
Regardless, extending examples (which, I mean, are called that way for a reason 
) sounds like a great idea for people who use them in production - so it’s likely a good step towards safe modernisation of three. 