This makes sense!!! This is how I imagined this to work. Not sure if I would chose the JS as output but I would save the other type of shader somewhere.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Advice for future-proofing with respect to WebGPU? | 3 | 7160 | July 13, 2024 | |
Some Threejs webgpu examples run fine on firefox, but others dont? | 1 | 92 | January 27, 2025 | |
Three.webgpu.js with "forceWebGL": WebGL in Chrome slower than WebGL in Firefox | 0 | 42 | May 14, 2025 | |
Will Three.js continue to thrive in the WebGPU era? | 23 | 20125 | February 22, 2024 | |
Shade - WebGPU graphics | 88 | 9080 | June 3, 2025 |