In general three.js is immensely useful and well designed. There is one design decision that makes no sense to me: Geometry does not derive from Object3D. Why? Some context: I often have the need to manipulate geometry before I insert it into a mesh. But all the properties I would expect to be part…

Geometry does not derive from Object3D. Why?

dugla October 18, 2021, 2:08pm 4

For context see my question - which I solved here:

Topic		Replies	Views
We should be able to draw with Geometry only --- without object3d Discussion geometry , object3d	11	1266	December 31, 2017
Updating Mesh position is not updating its own geometry Questions geometry , controls , transform-controls	15	3015	April 18, 2024
Position of object Questions positioning	5	4869	August 31, 2019
Create perpendicular object3D with a corresponding object3D Questions object3d , math	1	773	March 13, 2021
Analyze object topology Questions geometry	1	407	September 18, 2023