Is there a fundamental difference between using react-three-fiber
and three-js + react
separately?
what are the advantages and disadvantages of using one option over the other?
the docs go into this, specifically the first segments GitHub - pmndrs/react-three-fiber: 🇨🇠A React renderer for Three.js
check out the examples to get some idea where the potential is.
if you need a quick overview,
- less code, focus more on composition
- performant by default
- memory efficient, auto-disposes, re-use and caching everywhere
- pointer events inbuilt, bubbling, stoppropagation and capture
- the only eco system that threejs has (other than examples, gists, snippets and dispersed libraries)
using react with three separately makes little sense, you’d pit a declarative world against a imperative. you loose all integration, state, context, suspense, the eco system. it would be similar to constructing the UI with querySelectors and appendChild.
ps, here’s a technical breakdown of how it works, fiber is a renderer like react-dom, it is not a wrapper or binding.