# Web worker in 3js

**URL:** <https://discourse.threejs.org/t/web-worker-in-3js/69172>\
**Category:** Questions\
**Created:** [August 11, 2024, 8:49am UTC](https://discourse.threejs.org/t/web-worker-in-3js/69172 "2024-08-11T08:49:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rohith\_K](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.threejs.org/rohith_k/32/50353_2.png) [@Rohith\_K](https://discourse.threejs.org/u/Rohith_K)\
**Post date:** [August 11, 2024, 8:49am UTC](https://discourse.threejs.org/t/web-worker-in-3js/69172/1 "2024-08-11T08:49:46Z")

</div>

Can we use web worker to load atleast 2gb fbx files smoothly?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Himanshu\_Kaushik](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.threejs.org/himanshu_kaushik/32/62561_2.png) [@Himanshu\_Kaushik](https://discourse.threejs.org/u/Himanshu_Kaushik)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2025, 8:03pm UTC](https://discourse.threejs.org/t/web-worker-in-3js/69172/2 "2025-08-31T20:03:45Z")

</div>

I think its not about the size, its mainly about the user bandwidth, which is the main bottleneck with big files.

Using a web worker for decompression might help a bit in reducing the time.