Looks cool. I like your binding between component classes and the UI. I think you’ll need to make that very explicit at some point though, otherwise supporting things like textures, curves etc. will become quite difficult. There are a few engines out there using three.js. My own engine’s biggest shortcoming is the editor, so it’s cool to see others paying significant attention to that. Curious to see what this will turn into!
What will be the difference between The Rogue Engine and Unity/Unreal WebGL export? What makes it stand out? Why would someone choose your project over these giants? Not trying to be mean or demeaning, I absolutely love the idea . Just saying you have some big competition in front of ya
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, we are putting the biggest effort in the editor cause that’s where we believe the WebGL ecosystem in general is lacking. This project was born because we needed something like this and we couldn’t find it.
About the bindings, you are absolutely right, some inputs will need to be very explicit. At the moment, the component viewer, uses a factory to display the types of inputs that correspond to each property. For now it defaults to either Numeric, Text, Boolean or Object fields, but we’re working on an API to specify if you would like to see, for instance, a Range input instead of a Numeric field for a particular property.
There’s still a long way to go, but hopefully we’ll soon be releasing an Alpha. We hope to have you on board to try it out!
Thanks for the support! Those are some very valid questions.
What’s the difference between The Rogue Engine and Unity/Unreal WebGL export?
First and foremost, this is pure WebGL. While Unity and Unreal are fantastic Engines, they don’t do great with WebGL in fact, at least in the case of Unity (the one I know the most), their WebGL exports work terribly or not at all on mobile, and the built package is huge.
You can fully integrate your built product with any website… try that with a Unity build. Other than embedding, anything else turns into a real pain.
Why would someone choose your project over these giants?
What will be the difference between The Rogue Engine and Unity/Unreal WebGL export?
Playcanvas and Turbulenz are much closer competitors.
Unity and Unreal are both state of the art game engines, but not in the browser.
So is this still in development? Any progress since you posted? (I just realised this thread is four months old, sorry!)
No worries about the resurrection. This is still in development, I will release a new progress video before the end of the week. There’s been many structural changes that don’t really show much and that’s why it’s taken a little longer to throw an update.
Luckily we’ll have a working alpha mature enough to release, in 2-3 months. Let’s cross our fingers!
I was checking out the demo video again, and I could not help but be deeply impressed by the sound track! Could you tell us what is the track playing in the background?
PS: I’m pretty sure it’s not sandstorm
So here’s the update I promised.
- Improved Asset Management
- Geometry Inspector
- Material Inspector
- Saving Material files
- Swapping Materials
- Dropping Components
- Improved Component api
- Skybox System (ongoing)
- Adding geometries and Objects from the Hierarchy
On the way - short/mid term:
- Improved Skybox System
- Console Window
I’m moving soon so I’ll have a tough couple of months, I’ll try to go as fast as possible despite the chaos.
BTW… I don’t know if I should open a new post or keep adding to this one as I just did.
It is bumped nicely to the top, so I think it is best to stay in this thread for keeping the context. It is not a heavy thread anyway.
Just as promised! Prefabs
I’ll upload another one shooting the cannon!
Let’s shoot that cannon!
WHEN are you releasing this?! O_O
Hi Aerion! If all goes according to plan, the alpha should be out in a couple of months.
I promise to keep you posted. Keep your ear on the ground!
OMG I wrote “a couple of weeks” instead of “a couple of months” Glad I realized soon enough and edited.
Is this project open source?? Would love to contribute in any way I can.
Hi afryingpan! it’s not open source. At least not yet. For now you can create extensions and open source them. In the future you’ll also be able to publish them and sell them within the editor.
Hello lovely people of this forum. Here’s me again with another update video. I’m sorry it has taken so long but it’s been hard moving to my new City. It’s exciting times but the whole move is taking a toll on my productivity.
So, back to business. In this video what I show is how now it’s possible to create/save/load scene files, as well as setting the Skybox which can be switched between procedural and cube map. There’s other things I’ve added that are not on the video but here is the complete list of new features.
- Switch between procedural and cubemap Skybox
- Create/Save/Load scene files
- Top Menu bar
- Project Settings Menu: Set the title of the project and the scenes to use where the the first one is the entry scene. Will add other settings here later for Input, Quality, etc.
- Build For Web: Now it’s possible to build/export/whatever a project that you can serve like any website.
- Console Window.
- Dialog Manager: so that you can later on add your own dialogs for your editor extensions.
- isActiveCamera flag on the cameras which lets you set the active camera dynamically by hand or by code.
Then what’s left? You might be wondering.
- Some cleanup… this is gonna hurt.
- Packaging the damn thing… this is gonna hurt more.
And after that?
- Alpha release!!
And after that?
- Making it good enough for a beta with your invaluable feedback.
I hope you like the video.